Difference between revisions of "Self-concepts"
From OptimalScience
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Key Claims == | == Key Claims == | ||
− | * Anxiety is not a trait | + | * [[Anxiety is not a trait.]] |
− | |||
* Threat labels are always modifiable. | * Threat labels are always modifiable. | ||
* Threat labels are only modifiable at the moment they are triggered: you can retrain your amygdala only when the alarm is sounding. | * Threat labels are only modifiable at the moment they are triggered: you can retrain your amygdala only when the alarm is sounding. |
Revision as of 19:21, 26 June 2020
Key Claims
- Anxiety is not a trait.
- Threat labels are always modifiable.
- Threat labels are only modifiable at the moment they are triggered: you can retrain your amygdala only when the alarm is sounding.
- You are distractible during a task when there is something else you would rather do.
- Every distraction is an attempt to decrease the effort required of you at that moment.
- We are less aware of the avoidance element of distractions than of the approach element (toward what “is distracting us”).
- This makes us see distractions as something we passively experience rather than do to ourselves.
- Commitment to a task allows us to be ready to notice urges to avoid it that arise.
- With anxiety the central challenge is maintaining a positive appraisal of adrenaline.
- With distractions, the central challenge is the effort required by the task at hand.
- The deepest obstacle to growth is the avoidance of challenge itself.
- You only grow when you challenge yourself according to ideals. Then challenge = growth.
- Avoiding challenges, perceived as external, leads to vicious cycles.
- Approaching externalized challenges triggers self-concepts.
- Actively challenging yourself according to an ideal does not trigger self-concepts.
- Externalizing challenges produces the perception of drained energy / no motivation.
- Internalized challenges produce the energy we call motivation.
- Motivation only describes whether the challenge is being passively experienced or actively embraced.
- Actively challenging yourself requires strategies that produce steps for engagement.
- The habituation of strategies for engaging challenges is called mastery.
- Mastery ensures that challenges continually lead to growth.
- Giving up in the midst of a challenge leads to the forming and sensitizing of self-concepts.
- Self-concepts raise the challenge level for the next encounter with that challenge.
- Self-concepts are like threat labels.
- Self-concepts generalize (e.g., I’m not good at fractions… at math… at school…)
- Self-concepts are organized into schemas, forming a network — like a tree with twigs, branches, boughs, and a trunk.
- Self-concepts are essential to having a fixed mindset
- The fixed mindset leads toward passivity in the face of challenge, which externalizes the challenge
- Strategies are necessary for engaging challenge, leading to a within-encounter decrease in the difficulty of the challenge.
- The difficulty of a challenge is partly actual and partly perceived. (Same as threats: real risk vs perceived risk; latter is habituated by exposure exercises)
- The perceived challenge is a function of the self-concept.
- In the next counter, the challenge level would peak at a lower level; this is a between-encounter decrease in the perceived difficulty of the challenge, representing a habituation of the self-concept (perceived challenge) and also a habituation of the strategy (actual challenge; = mastery).
- No self-concepts are formed when one masters a challenge. The lasting effect is the strategy itself.