Nico Hulkenberg has lost his second row start for Sunday’s Abu Dhabi Grand Prix after he was handed a three-place grid penalty by the stewards.
The Haas driver passed both Carlos Sainz Jnr and Jack Doohan along the pit exit road in violation of this weekend’s rules.The penalty drops Hulkenberg from fourth on the grid to seventh as a result.
Hulkenberg was summoned to the stewards following the incident at the end of Q1 when drivers were heading out on track to start their final runs in the session. After exiting the pit lane behind Sainz and Doohan, Hulkenberg passed the pair of them through the underground pit exit road.
Normally, drivers are permitted to overtake rivals after crossing the pit exit line before joining the race track. However, race director Rui Marques prohibited drivers from overtaking along the pit entry road in his updated event notes published on Friday. These state drivers are only allowed to overtake if a rival car has an “obvious problem”.
Speaking to the stewards, Hulkenberg accepted that he had failed to follow this instruction but insisted he had “no other option but to breach the rules to get a lap in”.
The stewards determined that as Hulkenberg breached an instruction designed to prevent “potentially dangerous situations”, he had earned a grid drop rather than a lighter punishment such as a reprimand.
Advert | Become a RaceFans supporter and
The penalty means Hulkenberg will now start the season-ending grand prix from seventh on the grid. Max Verstappen, Pierre Gasly and George Russell will each be promoted one place on the grid to fourth, fifth and sixth respectively.
The penalty is potentially critical in the battle between Haas and Alpine for sixth place in the constructors’ championship. Hulkenberg would have started ahead of Alpine’s Gasly but will now start behind.
Haas must out-score Alpine by six points to prevent their rivals from beating them to sixth place in the championship.
Miss nothing from RaceFans
Get a daily email with all our latest stories - and nothing else. No marketing, no ads. Sign up here:
Go ad-free for just £1 per month
>> Find out more and sign up
2024 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix
- Did Tsunoda ‘destroy’ his team mates – and are Red Bull wrong to pick Lawson over him?
- McLaren were ‘0.7 seconds away from losing the title’ in Abu Dhabi – Brown
- Another name change for RB and new driver numbers revealed in 2025 F1 entry list
- Ranked: The Formula 1 cars of 2024, from slowest to fastest
- McLaren are world champions with fewest grand prix wins in 25 years
Jere (@jerejj)
7th December 2024, 18:32
His pit tunnel passes went unseen on the world feed, but a fair penalty, & if anything, Haas’ garage position should’ve been an advantage for them in qualifyings this year.
mzs16 (@mzs16)
7th December 2024, 19:01
Interesting one this… with how tight the field was in Q1, it’s understandable that Haas took a risk to get the best possible track position. It’s still a lot better to cop a penalty and start 7th than go safe and potentially miss out on Q2.
Coventry Climax
7th December 2024, 19:14
Pretty sad, actually. Very understandable Hulkenberg wanted to get a lap in. It’s quite pathetic to see them all go slow in the pitlane. Sure, go sooner would be the solution, but with the “tyres” Pirelli gives them, you want as much rubber on track as possible.
Still, good lap from Hulkenberg.
Esploratore (@esploratore1)
8th December 2024, 3:34
Ahah, I like how you put tyres in quotes, pirelli aren’t a popular supplier amongst fans!
SteveP
8th December 2024, 9:16
I don’t think you will find the race engineers and drivers will be sending Pirelli any Christmas cards, either.
The list of people who do like Pirelli tyres fills the rest of this line: Pirelli
Michael (@freelittlebirds)
7th December 2024, 20:04
Ridiculous – guess who did the same thing last year in FP2 and got away with it? None other than Max Verstappen.
And now Hulkenberg gets a penalty for trying to set a lap. This sport is nothing but a joke.
Wait, why is that a point? Oh, we are playing doubles lines this time around! Really, last time when I won Wimbledon we were playing singles. Yeah, my court, my rules!
Ben Rowe (@thegianthogweed)
7th December 2024, 20:44
Penalties are pretty consistent regarding being harsher in qualifying than practice. The same for the race over qualifying. There are plenty of things in practice that drivers never get penalties for that they would do come qualifying.
Michael (@freelittlebirds)
7th December 2024, 22:16
@thegianthogweed indeed safety has 3 tiers – practice, qualifying, and races. Technically, 4 tiers if we add Max Verstappen.
How is speeding in the pit lane safer during practice or qualifying? Are the crews’ lives more expendable on weekdays and Saturdays? That essentially means that the penalties are more important for the entertainment they provide than safety itself.
And the last time we were at Yas Marina, Max was inconvenienced by the existence of other drivers and passed them and there’s no penalty. A year later at the same event, Haas risks losing $10 million as a result of doing the same in order to put a lap in.
RUTH222
8th December 2024, 1:01
They also get a penalty because of the benefit you get from it. You get a benefit from speeding in the pitlane in a race. Not so much in free practice.
Today, the passing Hulkenberg did made sure he had an advantage – that’s why he got a penalty.
Michael (@freelittlebirds)
8th December 2024, 1:43
It’s a good point but the penalty always negates the benefit except in very few circumstances. Even the smallest penalty, a 5 second penalty, will almost never make up for speeding in the pit lane.
SPArtacus
8th December 2024, 12:39
I think An Sionnach had the most insightful / relevant post on Hulk’s penalty vs George getting away without a penalty for impeding Lawson:
notagrumpyfan
7th December 2024, 22:04
Ridiculous – guess who wants to apply last years event notes to this year’s race? None other than @whinylittlebirds.
Michael (@freelittlebirds)
7th December 2024, 22:10
@notagrumpyfan You cannot be changing the rules – clearly Max got away with it when he had nothing to gain. What’s next – race bans when another driver does what Max did in 2021? If I were Hulk, I’d have said my name is Max Verstappen – I have immunity. Thank you, goodbye.
David (@nvherman)
7th December 2024, 22:16
@freelittlebirds you cannot compare last season’s event to this year’s: the Race Director put a different rule in for this year, and everyone know what it was.
Therefore Verstappen wasn’t penalised in 2023, as he didn’t break the rules
Michael (@freelittlebirds)
7th December 2024, 22:21
@nvherman that sounds so ridiculous that I don’t even know what to say.
What are the rules du jour? Mr Marques, could I have some grated gruyere with my appetizer please? You cannot change them when the driver that committed the first offense gets away with it. Clearly this is in response to Max’s antics last year and Hulkenberg and Haas got penalized as is usually the case in these criminal situations.
notagrumpyfan
7th December 2024, 23:36
There is nothing you should say, other than: sorry guys, due to the blinkers I wear I wasn’t able to read the article which clearly explains that the RD issued additional rules this year.
And maybe add: my consistent bias stops me from seeing the obvious.
Michael (@freelittlebirds)
8th December 2024, 1:40
This race director, Rui Marques, is new and issued in his updated event notes published on Friday. Clearly I had read it and you hd not.
I’m not sure most drivers had read them and probably assumed it was legal based on Max’s driving last year.
Osnola
8th December 2024, 11:09
The vest and most realistic quote from littlewhinerbird..
So the mirror tip seems to work here.
Kata
8th December 2024, 11:31
@freelittlebirds
“I’m not sure most drivers had read them and probably assumed it was legal based on Max’s driving last year.”
Really? So drivers just drive around and not even check the rules that apply at that moment? Speaking of a joke, that’s a good one.
But on the other hand -> If there is one thing you cannot say about Verstappen is that he doesn’t know the rules.
Michael (@freelittlebirds)
8th December 2024, 12:48
They should do a test – it’d be fun to see the percentage.
Kata
8th December 2024, 6:24
The only thing that’s ridiculous is your comment. In the event notes (V2) of this weekend it’s clearly stated that for this event: “12.4 Overtaking is prohibited in the pit exit road unless a car slows with an obvious problem.”
Osnola
8th December 2024, 11:10
But is was an option to introduce max verstappen in a completely unrelated topic. How could michael miss that opportunity :)
Michael (@freelittlebirds)
8th December 2024, 12:50
12.4 ? The event notes have 12.4? Can you please share them? Did you read all the paperwork for your mortgage which you’ll have to pay over your entire life?
notagrumpyfan
7th December 2024, 23:35
There is nothing you should say, other than: sorry guys, due to the blinkers I wear I wasn’t able to read the article which clearly explains that the RD issued additional rules this year.
And maybe add: my consistent bias stops me from seeing the obvious.
SPArtacus
8th December 2024, 12:43
Lot of Hulk cultists these days? I don’t remember seeing one ever. Do you know how many dozens if not hundreds of times drivers have been “noted” but not penalized for violations of RD directives during quali and free practice? What makes this discretionary decision any different?
lynn-m
7th December 2024, 23:50
It’s a pretty dumb thing to ‘ban’ because the pit lane is technically still a part of the racetrack and a part of it where overtaking has traditionally been allowed so long as it wasn’t done in an unsafe way.
I saw Anthony Davidson’s analysis of it and what Nico did was not done in an unsafe way.
It’s just another joke rule to add to the already over-regulated list of things that end up with drivers getting absurdly dumb and unnecessary penalties.
May as well just ban cars from getting close to each other.